IEG’s Sponsorship Blogs

Shaking Hands, Kissing Babies and Sponsoring NASCAR?

Posted: 2/8/2010 3:25:55 PM by Rob Campbell | with 4 comments

Although yet to officially begin, the 2010 NASCAR season has seen a flurry of sponsorship activity.

Perhaps the most interesting deal came last week when U.S. Rep. Kendrick Meek, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for Florida’s open U.S. Senate seat, announced his one-race primary sponsorship of JD Motorsports’ No. 01 entry in this Saturday’s Nationwide Series opening race at Daytona Int’l Speedway.

As lead sponsor of the Mike Wallace-driven car in the Drive4COPD 300, Meek’s sponsorship clearly targets Florida NASCAR fans both attending the event and those watching on TV.

Although not the first of its kind—another Florida Democrat, former U.S. Sen. Bob Graham’s fledgling presidential campaign sponsored a Craftsman Truck Series team in 2003 and President Obama’s campaign discussed the idea in 2008—Rep. Meek’s sponsorship demonstrates a forward-thinking approach towards effectively reaching his target audience.

In addition to simply reaching an important electoral demographic, aptly labeled “NASCAR dads,” the Senate hopeful also is using the sponsorship to solicit donations. On his campaign Web site, Meek is activating the sponsorship by giving supporters a chance to win the opportunity to attend the race with the candidate by contributing to his campaign fund. (Visitors to the site also can enter to win without contributing, as required by law.)

Despite engaging fans on many levels, this sponsorship is not without risk.

For example, a multi-car crash caused by the Meek-sponsored car could anger potential voters and NASCAR fans, especially if it affected the finish of their favorite drivers.

By sponsoring a NASCAR entry, as opposed to the event, the adversarial nature of the sport comes into play as well. At varying levels, fans will be cheering against the Meek car and invariably Meek himself.

Going to an even greater extreme, sponsoring a car in NASCAR links the sponsor to the driver. If Wallace were to fall into disrepute, it could provide ample political fodder against Meek in the future.

In a perfect world (dollar figures notwithstanding), a safer play would be sponsorship of the race as opposed to an individual team. This approach would negate many possible pitfalls, yet still provide for Meek’s activation campaign encouraging donations.

Possible negative scenarios aside, Meek’s sponsorship of NASCAR is a refreshing alternative to political smear ads.

 

Read more blog posts

Filed under: sports, non-traditional categories

Share |
Comments

Please login to post a comment.

Vinu Joseph
With the recent Supreme Court ruling on corporate campaign spending, I'll be interested to see if companies tap into their sponsorships as part of the effort. They might not activate around the message with promotions and the like, but it could be as simple as replacing their corporate branding with something like "Universal Healthcare Now".

Would a sponsor do it and, just as important, should the property allow it?
2/8/2010 5:06:41 PM
 
Jim Andrews
Only a for-profit property could allow it, as nonprofits would jeopardize their tax-exempt status by allowing political advocacy.

As for whether sponsors would do it, I don't think most mass-market companies would see the advantage in getting political, unless it was something directly related to their industry, like supporting de-regulation.
2/8/2010 6:11:25 PM
 
Carrie Urban
More than a "normal" sponsor, it will be critical for Meek to communicate the reasons for his support of NASCAR. We all know that marketing plays a key role in political campaigns and standard advertising for political campaigns seem to be less and less effective. Through this sponsorship, Meek needs to deliver some sort of messaging going beyond visual recognition. His attendance at the race, his support of the Florida economy and the financial health of NASCAR and the promotional aspect of the sponsorship seem to be going in the right direction, but it will be important that he can communicate to a larger audience. Otherwise, it could leave him open to the criticisms of wasteful spending. Do you agree?.
2/9/2010 10:24:40 AM
 
Jim Andrews
Although any criticism of his spending would be mitigated by the fact that he is spending his own campaign funds, not taxpayer dollars, I agree with Carrie that he would be wise to tie the sponsorship into something meaningful to voters.
2/10/2010 4:35:11 PM
 

Tags

Subscribe 

RSS 2.0

Atom 1.0

IEG Bloggers

Read what’s on the minds of IEG’s sponsorship experts relating to the latest industry news and trends.


Comments, views and opinions expressed by employees of IEG are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of IEG, LLC or its management.

 Subscribe

RSS 2.0

Atom 1.0