IEG's Sponsorship Blog: Jim Andrews

IEG’s Sponsorship Blog

About IEG > Sponsorship Blogs > Jim Andrews > July 2010 > The Conundrum Of Size In Sponsorship

The Conundrum Of Size In Sponsorship

Posted: 7/22/2010 12:38:47 PM by Jim Andrews | with 3 comments

As with many other things, size both does and doesn’t matter when it comes to sponsorship.

In response to my colleague Carrie Kapraun’s blog post regarding the efficacy of sponsorship programs for various property types, a commenter posed a question from the sponsor perspective, essentially asking whether sponsorship was strictly the domain of large businesses and out of the reach of smaller ones.

I have heard this question plenty of times before, and my answer is always the same: Sponsorship, like most marketing tools, can be effective for any size business if it is employed correctly.

The question usually arises, as it did in this case, from an assumption that sponsorships are limited to the marquee deals that make for good headlines and case studies. If that were true then yes, only deep-pocketed companies could afford things like venue naming rights, bowl game title deals and national concert tours by top-name stars.

But that assumption is the equivalent of saying, advertising opportunities consist only of prime time TV spots, full-color spreads in national magazines, and billboards along major interstate highways.

Just as with advertising, small-business sponsors can choose from a huge variety of opportunities that are appropriately scaled for the size and scope of the company, whether we are talking about local deals, partnerships aimed at a niche target market or a lower-level package of benefits with a large property.

It is perhaps true, as the commenter suggests, that a small or upstart company could benefit better than any other sponsor from the visibility that a marquee sponsorship could offer. But if such a deal is unrealistic due to budget constraints, there are options. Perhaps a local chain of cosmetic dentistry offices cannot afford to name the new NBA arena in town, but chances are the team has opportunities available for less than six figures that will provide a platform to raise the company’s profile, build a prospect database, etc. Obviously, a smart activation plan is necessary in this scenario to turn the package of benefits into something relevant and meaningful.

Over the past 20-plus years, I have seen many lower-level sponsors develop programs that deliver return on investment that far surpasses the relatively inexpensive entry fee, proving that it is indeed not the size of the budget that matters, but what you do with it.

 

Read more blog posts

Filed under: what is sponsorship, activation

Share |
Comments

Please login to post a comment.

Bill Herring
Quite right Jim, don't have to have big dollars to drive positive results. A local example in Austin is Sweet Leaf Tea (I have no relationship with them). They started in the late 90's, selling bottled iced tea. They participated in numerous local events as a vendor or sponsor. Combined with a good product and hip brand personality, they've grown to a national beverage company and continue to participate in events. Grassroots to national brand in about 10 years, and I believe their event program was a contributing factor - see http://sweetleaftea.com/
7/23/2010 8:12:45 AM
 
Bill Coleman
Bellco Credit Union, and South Denver Cardiology Associates, two of our clients, and certainly not huge in size, are creating an outsize buzz by sponsoring our solar powered Bubble Tower at local events. The quality of the experience is what attracts attention, and the SPBT creates an outstanding experience with a minimal financial outlay.
8/3/2010 8:30:48 AM
 
Cam Suarez-Bitar
Dear Mr. Andrews:

Thanks for your response to the questions I considered in Ms. Kapraun’s post on 9 July 2010 regarding sponsorship myths. For some time I had wondered whether or not small businesses could benefit as much as larger companies from sponsorships.

On page 137 of IEG’s Guide to Sponsorship (2010), Lesa Ukman states that emotions – not eyeballs – determine a marketing strategy’s effectiveness. Also, I see from your post that in spite of a possibly limited budget, small businesses still have the opportunity to sponsor key properties/events that would help them execute their overall marketing strategies. So, in the end, it’s more about activation than size.

Indeed, budget size is not such a critical factor. If the sponsor - big or small - is absent and not missed at the next occurrence of the same event, then it did not successfully activate and most likely did not generate the expected return.

Best regards,




Cam Suarez-Bitar.
8/4/2010 6:58:16 PM
 

Jim’s Tags

About the Author

Jim Andrews is senior vice president and editorial director of IEG. A 22-year industry veteran, he can remember tracking the industry on index cards and typesetting the early editions of IEG Sponsorship Report. Nevertheless, he has embraced the enhanced communication with the industry offered by social media and enjoys sharing his experienced views on issues of topical interest through his blog posts and commentary. Follow Jim on Twitter!

Subscribe 

RSS 2.0

Atom 1.0

IEG Bloggers

Read what’s on the minds of IEG’s sponsorship experts relating to the latest industry news and trends.


Comments, views and opinions expressed by employees of IEG are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of IEG, LLC or its management.